- Learn to interpret Bias and Variance in a given model.
- What is the difference between Bias and Variance?
- How to achieve Bias and Variance Tradeoff using Machine Learning workflow

Let us talk about the weather. It rains only if it’s a little humid and does not rain if it’s windy, hot or freezing. In this case, how would you train a predictive model and ensure that there are no errors in forecasting the weather? You may say that there are many learning algorithms to choose from. They are distinct in many ways but there is a major difference in what we expect and what the model predicts. That’s the concept of Bias and Variance Tradeoff. In this article, you will get to know about the bias variance tradeoff, with bias and variance in machine learning, also you will get to know about What is bias and variance in machine learning.

Usually, Bias and Variance Tradeoff is taught through dense mathematical formulas. But in this article, I have attempted to explain Bias and Variance as simply as possible!

My focus will be to spin you through the process of understanding the problem statement and ensuring that you choose the best model where the Bias and Variance errors are minimal.

For this, I have taken up the popular Pima Indians Diabetes dataset. The dataset consists of diagnostic measurements of adult female patients of Native Indian Pima Heritage. For this dataset, we are going to focus on the “Outcome” variable – which indicates whether the patient has diabetes or not. Evidently, this is a binary classification problem and we are going to dive right in and learn how to go about it.

If you are interested in this and data science concepts and want to learn practically refer to our course- Introduction to Data Science

The primary aim of the Machine Learning models is to learn from the given data and generate predictions based on the pattern observed during the learning process. However, our task doesn’t end there. We need to continuously make improvements to the models, based on the kind of results it generates. We also quantify the model’s performance using metrics like Accuracy, Mean Squared Error(MSE), F1-Score, etc and try to improve these metrics. This can often get tricky when we have to maintain the flexibility of the model without compromising on its correctness.

A supervised Machine Learning model aims to train itself on the input variables(X) in such a way that the predicted values(Y) are as close to the actual values as possible (Modafinil). This difference between the actual values and predicted values is the **error** and it is used to evaluate the model. The error for any supervised Machine Learning algorithm comprises of 3 parts:

- Bias error
- Variance error
- The noise

While the noise is the irreducible error that we cannot eliminate, the other two i.e. Bias and Variance are reducible errors that we can attempt to minimize as much as possible.

In the following sections, we will cover the Bias error, Variance error, and the Bias-Variance tradeoff which will aid us in the best model selection. And what’s exciting is that we will cover some techniques to deal with these errors by using an example dataset.

As explained earlier, we have taken up the Pima Indians Diabetes dataset and formed a classification problem on it. Let’s start by gauging the dataset and observe the kind of data we are dealing with. We will do this by importing the necessary libraries:

Now, we will load the data into a data frame and observe some rows to get insights into the data.

**Python Code:**

We need to predict the ‘Outcome’ column. Let us separate it and assign it to a target variable ‘y’. The rest of the data frame will be the set of input variables X.

Now let’s scale the predictor variables and then separate the training and the testing data.

Since the outcomes are classified in a binary form, we will use the simplest K-nearest neighbor classifier(Knn) to classify whether the patient has diabetes or not.

However, how do we decide the value of ‘k’?

- Maybe we should use k = 1 so that we will get very good results on our training data? That might work, but we cannot guarantee that the model will perform just as well on our testing data since it can get too specific
- How about using a high value of k, say like k = 100 so that we can consider a large number of nearest points to account for the distant points as well? However, this kind of model will be too generic and we cannot be sure if it has considered all the possible contributing features correctly.

Let us take a few possible values of k and fit the model on the training data for all those values. We will also compute the training score and testing score for all those values.

To derive more insights from this, let us plot the training data(in red) and the testing data(in blue).

To calculate the scores for a particular value of k,

We can make the following conclusions from the above plot:

- For low values of k, the training score is high, while the testing score is low
- As the value of k increases, the testing score starts to increase and the training score starts to decrease.
- However, at some value of k, both the training score and the testing score are close to each other.

This is where Bias and Variance come into the picture.

In the simplest terms, Bias is the difference between the Predicted Value and the Expected Value. To explain further, the model makes certain assumptions when it trains on the data provided. When it is introduced to the testing/validation data, these assumptions may not always be correct.

In our model, if we use a large number of nearest neighbors, the model can totally decide that some parameters are not important at all. For example, it can just consider that the Glusoce level and the Blood Pressure decide if the patient has diabetes. This model would make very strong assumptions about the other parameters not affecting the outcome. You can also think of it as a model predicting a simple relationship when the datapoints clearly indicate a more complex relationship:

Mathematically, let the input variables be X and a target variable Y. We map the relationship between the two using a function f.

Therefore,

**Y = f(X) + e**

Here ‘e’ is the error that is normally distributed. The aim of our model f'(x) is to predict values as close to f(x) as possible. Here, the Bias of the model is:

**Bias[f'(X)] = E[f'(X) – f(X)]**

As I explained above, when the model makes the generalizations i.e. when there is a high bias error, it results in a very simplistic model that does not consider the variations very well. Since it does not learn the training data very well, it is called **Underfitting.**

Contrary to bias, the Variance is when the model takes into account the fluctuations in the data i.e. the noise as well. So, what happens when our model has a high variance?

The model will still consider the variance as something to learn from. That is, the model learns too much from the training data, so much so, that when confronted with new (testing) data, it is unable to predict accurately based on it.

Mathematically, the variance error in the model is:

**Variance[f(x)****)=E[X^2]âˆ’E[X****]^2**

Since in the case of high variance, the model learns too much from the training data, it is called **overfitting.**

In the context of our data, if we use very few nearest neighbors, it is like saying that if the number of pregnancies is more than 3, the glucose level is more than 78, Diastolic BP is less than 98, Skin thickness is less than 23 mm and so on for every feature….. decide that the patient has diabetes. All the other patients who don’t meet the above criteria are not diabetic. While this may be true for one particular patient in the training set, what if these parameters are the outliers or were even recorded incorrectly? Clearly, such a model could prove to be very costly!

Additionally, this model would have a high variance error because the predictions of the patient being diabetic or not vary greatly with the kind of training data we are providing it. So even changing the Glucose Level to 75 would result in the model predicting that the patient does not have diabetes.

To make it simpler, the model predicts very complex relationships between the outcome and the input features when a quadratic equation would have sufficed. This is how a classification model would look like when there is a high variance error/when there is **overfitting**:

To summarise,

- A model with a high bias error underfits data and makes very simplistic assumptions on it
- A model with a high variance error overfits the data and learns too much from it
- A good model is where both Bias and Variance errors are balanced

The bias-variance tradeoff is a fundamental concept in machine learning and statistics. It refers to the delicate balance between two sources of error in a predictive model: bias and variance.

Bias represents the error due to overly simplistic assumptions in the learning algorithm. High bias can cause the model to underfit the data, leading to poor performance on both training and unseen data.

Variance, on the other hand, reflects the model’s sensitivity to small fluctuations in the training data. High variance can lead to overfitting, where the model captures noise in the training data and performs poorly on new, unseen data.

The goal is to find the right level of complexity in a model to minimize both bias and variance, achieving good generalization to new data. Balancing these factors is essential for building models that perform well on a variety of datasets.

How do we relate the above concepts to our Knn model from earlier? Let’s find out!

In our model, say, for, k = 1, the point closest to the datapoint in question will be considered. Here, the prediction might be accurate for that particular data point so the bias error will be less.

However, the variance error will be high since only the one nearest point is considered and this doesn’t take into account the other possible points. What scenario do you think this corresponds to? Yes, you are thinking right, this means that our model is overfitting.

On the other hand, for higher values of k, many more points closer to the datapoint in question will be considered. This would result in higher bias error and underfitting since many points closer to the datapoint are considered and thus it can’t learn the specifics from the training set. However, we can account for a lower variance error for the testing set which has unknown values.

To achieve a balance between the Bias error and the Variance error, we need a value of k such that the model neither learns from the noise (overfit on data) nor makes sweeping assumptions on the data(underfit on data). To keep it simpler, a balanced model would look like this:

Though some points are classified incorrectly, the model generally fits most of the datapoints accurately. The balance between the Bias error and the Variance error is the **Bias-Variance Tradeoff**.

The following bulls-eye diagram explains the tradeoff better:

The center i.e. the bull’s eye is the model result we want to achieve that perfectly predicts all the values correctly. As we move away from the bull’s eye, our model starts to make more and more wrong predictions.

A model with low bias and high variance predicts points that are around the center generally, but pretty far away from each other. A model with high bias and low variance is pretty far away from the bull’s eye, but since the variance is low, the predicted points are closer to each other.

In terms of model complexity, we can use the following diagram to decide on the optimal complexity of our model.

So, what do you think is the optimum value for k?

From the above explanation, we can conclude that the k for which

- the testing score is the highest, and
- both the test score and the training score are close to each other

is the optimal value of k. So, even though we are compromising on a lower training score, we still get a high score for our testing data which is more crucial – the test data is after all unknown data.

Let us make a table for different values of k to further prove this:

To summarize, in this article, we learned that an ideal model would be one where both the bias error and the variance error are low. However, we should always aim for a model where the model score for the training data is as close as possible to the model score for the testing data.

That’s where we figured out how to choose a model that is not too complex (High variance and low bias) which would lead to overfitting and nor too simple(High Bias and low variance) which would lead to underfitting.

Bias and Variance plays an important role in deciding which predictive model to use. I hope this article explained the concept well.

Hope you like the article and get understanding of Bias variance tradeoff and get insights about what is bias and variance in machine learning.

A. The bias-variance tradeoff in machine learning involves managing two types of errors. Bias arises from overly simplistic models, leading to underfitting, while variance results from complex models capturing noise, causing overfitting. Balancing these errors is crucial for creating models that generalize well to new data, optimizing performance and robustness.

A. The bias-variance method is an approach in machine learning that analyzes the tradeoff between bias and variance to optimize model performance. By adjusting a model’s complexity, it aims to strike a balance between underfitting (high bias) and overfitting (high variance). This method guides the selection of appropriate models, helping to create accurate and robust predictions on new data.

In machine learning, bias and variance are two essential concepts that influence a model’s ability to generalize to unseen data. Bias represents the inherent error due to the model’s assumptions, while variance measures the model’s sensitivity to training data. A balance between these two error types is crucial for optimal performance.

The bias-variance tradeoff is about finding the right balance between simplicity and complexity in a machine learning model. High bias means the model is too simple and consistently misses the target, while high variance means the model is too complex and shoots all over the place. You want to aim for a model that’s just right – not too simple, not too complex – to make accurate predictions on new data.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit,

Hi AWESOME POST!! One clarity is needed : From the bulls-eye diagram High Bias & Low Variance case , the points are away from target(Ground truth both in Training & Testing) then how by the defintion of variance ( high if model is unable to predict new unseen data) its low? Kindly help me improve myself on this please.

Hi Padma, Thanks! When there is low variance, it means that the prediction has small changes with small changes to the data. Thus we get consistent models(not much change in the predictions, i.e. low variance) though with a very low rate of correct predictions(predictions far from the ground truth, i.e. high bias). Hope this helps!

Great explanation. I needed this. I think data normalization should be done after splitting the data and not before it because it adds is a potential bias in the evaluation of the performance. Let me know your opinion.

Hi Padma, This is a great post. I was wondering though, how the "model can totally decide that some parameters are not important at all"? I can't picture this graphically. Each plot is a record of 9 dimensions, correct? All the features are computed to make a plot for each record. So I don't see how only the "Glucose level and the Blood Pressure decide if the patient has diabetes". I can see that these two features have relatively high values, but the plots to not represent sum totals of the records, but rather a plot. So how can they influence the model so much for a high k value? For any k value, for that matter. Please help me understand this.

AWESOME explanation... I saved the post for the bookmark. One have one question. Why for the high variance the data points are catered (not near to each other). but for the low variance they do

A very clear explanantion !!!

The example under the section with title "Understand Bias-Variance Tradeoff with the help of an example" seems to be incorrect. When K = 1, the model learns from nearest datapoints and ignores the farther datapoints so it means it makes certain assumptions and learns very little from the data, then shouldn't be it High bias and low variance. Here the model is becoming underfitting. Similarly when K is very high value then the model will try to learn from as much as datapoints possible causing the High Variance. Here the model is becoming overfitting.