Bhaskarjit Sarmah

Bhaskarjit Sarmah

Head of Financial Services AI Research

About

Bhaskarjit Sarmah, Head of Financial Services AI Research at Domyn, leverages over 11 years of data science expertise across diverse industries. Previously, at BlackRock, he pioneered machine learning solutions to bolster liquidity risk analytics, uncover pricing opportunities in securities lending, and develop market regime change detection systems using network science. Bhaskarjit's proficiency extends to natural language processing and computer vision, enabling him to extract insights from unstructured data and deliver actionable reports. Committed to empowering investors and fostering superior financial outcomes, he embodies a strategic fusion of data-driven innovation and domain knowledge in the world's largest asset management firm.

Text-to-SQL is, by most leaderboards, a solved problem. Models post impressive scores and the progress feels real, and then the same architecture gets pointed at a real enterprise warehouse and the numbers fall off a cliff.
Why? The benchmarks we celebrate are built on small, tidy, well-documented schemas with neatly phrased questions and a single obvious answer. Reality is the opposite: hundreds of tables with cryptic names, business terms that map to no column directly, joins that depend on knowledge living only in someone's head, and questions where the same word means three different things depending on who's asking. The way we score these systems doesn't survive the move either, a result that's subtly wrong gets treated the same as one that's obviously right, so the failures that hurt most are exactly the ones our metrics are blind to.

This session looks at where the gap actually lives: in the questions we test against, and in the scores we trust. We'll unpack why ""it works in the demo keeps turning into it broke in production, and what better evaluation could look like.

Read More →

It's the Friday afternoon task every analyst knows. You've been handed a messy folder full of Excel files, and by the end of the day, your manager expects a clean, board-ready presentation. 

In this live challenge, three panelists each work with a different AI coworker. Starting with the exact same folder and the same business brief, they have about 15 minutes to complete the same task using nothing but plain-English instructions. 

The task: Organize the folder, identify and clean the relevant data, analyze the sales workbook, reconcile the numbers against a target finance figure, and turn the results into a polished executive presentation. Along the way, the AI coworker must make sensible decisions, ask for confirmation before destructive actions like deleting files, handle ambiguous requests, and explain what it cannot determine instead of making things up. 

Every step happens live. You'll watch each AI coworker inspect and organize files, clean messy spreadsheets, work through incomplete and imperfect data, create charts, and build a leadership-ready presentation. Once all three have finished, the panelists compare their experiences and discuss where each AI coworker succeeded, where it struggled, and when human oversight was still essential. 

The question for the room is simple: Are today's AI coworkers ready to independently handle real business workflows, or do they still need a human guiding them every step of the way?

WHAT YOU'LL SEE 

  • Three AI coworkers tackle the exact same business task, starting with the same messy folder and the same brief.  
  • A real workflow unfold live, from organizing files and cleaning spreadsheets to building a board-ready presentation.  
  • How each AI coworker interprets plain-English instructions, handles ambiguous requests, and makes decisions when the data isn't straightforward.  
  • Trust-critical moments in action, including asking for confirmation before deleting files, reconciling numbers against finance targets, and flagging missing information instead of guessing.  
  • A side-by-side comparison of each AI coworker's reasoning, reliability, and quality of output. 

 

Read More →

In this hands-on workshop, participants will learn how reinforcement learning (RL) is used to train large language model–based agents that can make sequential decisions, interact with environments, call tools autonomously, and improve performance through experience. 
 
We will cover RL fundamentals for LLM agents, extend Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) to agent settings, explore modular RL frameworks, and dive into practical implementations using OpenPipe’s Agent Reinforcement Trainer (ART). By the end, attendees will understand how to design, train, and evaluate RL-based LLM agents for real-world tasks. 

*Note: These are tentative details and are subject to change. 

 

Read More →