Optimization is always the ultimate goal whether you are dealing with a real life problem or building a software product. I, as a computer science student, always fiddled with optimizing my code to the extent that I could brag about its fast execution.

Optimization basically means getting the optimal output for your problem. If you read the recent article on optimization, you would be acquainted with how optimization plays an important role in our real-life.

Optimization in machine learning has a slight difference. Generally, while optimizing, we know exactly how our data looks like and what areas we want to improve. But in machine learning we have no clue how our “new data” looks like, let alone try to optimize on it.

So in machine learning, we perform optimization on the training data and check its performance on a new validation data.

There are various kinds of optimization techniques which are applied across various domains such as

**Mechanics –**For eg: In deciding the surface of aerospace design**Economics –**For eg: Cost minimization**Physics –**For eg: Optimization time in quantum computing

Optimization has many more advanced applications like deciding optimal route for transportation, shelf-space optimization, etc.

Many popular machine algorithms depend upon optimization techniques such as linear regression, k-nearest neighbors, neural networks, etc. The applications of optimization are limitless and is a widely researched topic in both academia and industries.

In this article, we will look at a particular optimization technique called Gradient Descent. It is the most commonly used optimization technique when dealing with machine learning.

- What is Gradient Descent?
- Challenges in executing Gradient Descent
- Variants of Gradient Descent algorithm
- Implementation of Gradient Descent
- Practical tips on applying gradient descent
- Additional Resources

To explain Gradient Descent I’ll use the classic mountaineering example.

Suppose you are at the top of a mountain, and you have to reach a lake which is at the lowest point of the mountain (a.k.a valley). A twist is that you are blindfolded and you have zero visibility to see where you are headed. So, what approach will you take to reach the lake?

The best way is to check the ground near you and observe where the land tends to descend. This will give an idea in what direction you should take your first step. If you follow the descending path, it is very likely you would reach the lake.

To represent this graphically, notice the below graph.

Let us now map this scenario in mathematical terms.

Suppose we want to find out the best parameters (θ1) and (θ2) for our learning algorithm. Similar to the analogy above, we see we find similar mountains and valleys when we plot our “cost space”. Cost space is nothing but how our algorithm would perform when we choose a particular value for a parameter.

So on the y-axis, we have the cost J(θ) against our parameters θ1 and θ2 on x-axis and z-axis respectively. Here, hills are represented by red region, which have high cost, and valleys are represented by blue region, which have low cost.

Now there are many types of gradient descent algorithms. They can be classified by two methods mainly:

**On the basis of data ingestion**- Full Batch Gradient Descent Algorithm
- Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithm

In full batch gradient descent algorithms, you use whole data at once to compute the gradient, whereas in stochastic you take a sample while computing the gradient.

**On the basis of differentiation techniques**- First order Differentiation
- Second order Differentiation

Gradient descent requires calculation of gradient by differentiation of cost function. We can either use first order differentiation or second order differentiation.

Gradient Descent is a sound technique which works in most of the cases. But there are many cases where gradient descent does not work properly or fails to work altogether. There are three main reasons when this would happen:

- Data challenges
- Gradient challenges
- Implementation challenges

- If the data is arranged in a way that it poses a
**non-convex optimization problem.**It is very difficult to perform optimization using gradient descent. Gradient descent only works for problems which have a well defined convex optimization problem. - Even when optimizing a convex optimization problem, there may be numerous minimal points. The lowest point is called global minimum, whereas rest of the points are called local minima. Our aim is to go to global minimum while avoiding local minima.
- There is also a saddle point problem. This is a point in the data where the gradient is zero but is not an optimal point. We don’t have a specific way to avoid this point and is still an active area of research.

- If the execution is not done properly while using gradient descent, it may lead to problems like vanishing gradient or exploding gradient problems. These problems occur when the gradient is too small or too large. And because of this problem the algorithms do not converge.

- Most of the neural network practitioners don’t generally pay attention to implementation, but it’s very important to look at the resource utilization by networks. For eg: When implementing gradient descent, it is very important to note how many resources you would require. If the memory is too small for your application, then the network would fail.
- Also, its important to keep track of things like floating point considerations and hardware / software prerequisites.

Let us look at most commonly used gradient descent algorithms and their implementations.

This is the simplest form of gradient descent technique. Here, vanilla means pure / without any adulteration. Its main feature is that we take small steps in the direction of the minima by taking gradient of the cost function.

Let’s look at its pseudocode.

update = learning_rate * gradient_of_parameters parameters = parameters - update

Here, we see that we make an update to the parameters by taking gradient of the parameters. And multiplying it by a learning rate, which is essentially a constant number suggesting how fast we want to go the minimum. Learning rate is a hyper-parameter and should be treated with care when choosing its value.

Here, we tweak the above algorithm in such a way that we pay heed to the prior step before taking the next step.

Here’s a pseudocode.

update = learning_rate * gradient velocity = previous_update * momentum parameter = parameter + velocity – update

Here, our update is the same as that of vanilla gradient descent. But we introduce a new term called velocity, which considers the previous update and a constant which is called momentum.

ADAGRAD uses adaptive technique for learning rate updation. In this algorithm, on the basis of how the gradient has been changing for all the previous iterations we try to change the learning rate.

Here’s a pseudocode

grad_component = previous_grad_component + (gradient * gradient) rate_change = square_root(grad_component) + epsilon adapted_learning_rate = learning_rate * rate_change

update = adapted_learning_rate * gradient parameter = parameter – update

In the above code, epsilon is a constant which is used to keep rate of change of learning rate in check.

ADAM is one more adaptive technique which builds on adagrad and further reduces it downside. In other words, you can consider this as momentum + ADAGRAD.

Here’s a pseudocode.

adapted_gradient = previous_gradient + ((gradient – previous_gradient) * (1 – beta1)) gradient_component = (gradient_change – previous_learning_rate) adapted_learning_rate = previous_learning_rate + (gradient_component * (1 – beta2))

update = adapted_learning_rate * adapted_gradient parameter = parameter – update

Here beta1 and beta2 are constants to keep changes in gradient and learning rate in check

There are also second order differentiation method like l-BFGS. You can see an implementation of this algorithm in scipy library.

We will now look at a basic implementation of gradient descent using python.

Here we will use gradient descent optimization to find our best parameters for our deep learning model on an application of image recognition problem. Our problem is an image recognition, to identify digits from a given 28 x 28 image. We have a subset of images for training and the rest for testing our model. In this article we will take a look at how we define gradient descent and see how our algorithm performs. Refer this article for an end-to-end implementation using python.

Here is the main code for defining vanilla gradient descent,

params = [weights_hidden, weights_output, bias_hidden, bias_output]

def sgd(cost, params, lr=0.05): grads = T.grad(cost=cost, wrt=params) updates = [] for p, g in zip(params, grads): updates.append([p, p - g * lr]) return updates updates = sgd(cost, params)

Now we break it down to understand it better.

We defined a function sgd with arguments as cost, params and lr. These represent J(θ) as seen previously, θ i.e. the parameters of our deep learning algorithm and our learning rate. We set default learning rate as 0.05, but this can be changed easily as per our preference.

def sgd(cost, params, lr=0.05):

We then defined gradients of our parameters with respect to the cost function. Here we used theano library to find gradients and we imported theano as T

grads = T.grad(cost=cost, wrt=params)

and finally iterated through all the parameters to find out the updates for all possible parameters. You can see that we use vanilla gradient descent here.

for p, g in zip(params, grads): updates.append([p, p - g * lr]

We can use this function to then find the best optimal parameters for our neural network. On using this function, we find that our neural network does a good enough job in finding the digits in our image as seen below

Prediction is: 8

In this implementation, we see that on using gradient descent we can get optimal parameters for our deep learning algorithm.

Each of the above mentioned gradient descent algorithms have their strengths and weaknesses. I’ll just mention some quick tips which might help you choose the right algorithm.

- For rapid prototyping, use adaptive techniques like Adam/Adagrad. These help in getting quicker results with much less efforts. As here, you don’t require much hyper-parameter tuning.
- To get the best results, you should use vanilla gradient descent or momentum. gradient descent is slow to get the desired results, but these results are mostly better than adaptive techniques.
- If your data is small and can be fit in a single iteration, you can use 2nd order techniques like l-BFGS. This is because 2nd order techniques are extremely fast and accurate, but are only feasible when data is small enough
- There also an emerging method (which I haven’t tried but looks promising) to use learned features to predict learning rates of gradient descent. Go through this paper for more details.

Now there are many reasons why a neural network fails to learn. But it helps immensely if you can monitor where your algorithm is going wrong.

When applying gradient descent, you can look at these points which might be helpful in circumventing the problem:

**Error rates**– You should check the training and testing error after specific iterations and make sure both of them decreases. If that is not the case, there might be a problem!**Gradient flow in hidden layers –**Check if the network doesn’t show a vanishing gradient problem or exploding gradient problem.**Learning rate**– which you should check when using adaptive techniques.

- Refer this paper on overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms.
- CS231n Course material on gradient descent.
- Chapter 4 (Numerical optimization) and Chapter 8 (Optimization for Deep Learning models) of Deep Learning book

I hope you enjoyed reading this article. After going through this article, you will be adept with the basics of gradient descent and its variants. I have also given a practical tips for implementing them. Hope you found them helpful!

If you have any questions or doubts, feel free to post them in the comments below.

adagradadamdeep learningFirst order differentiationFull batch gradient descentgradient descentgradient descent algorithmgradient descent challengegradient descent techniquesgradient descent with monemtumgradient techniquesmachine leanringpractical tipsSecond order differentiationstocstochastic gradientvanilla gradient descent

In the section about momentum, is the sign " + velocity" correct? If I look at the graph then I would assume that the gradient term and velocity are first added and then subtracted. Is this correct?

Hey richard. Think of momentum in physics terms; you gain momentum "in the same direction" if you are going downhill. and will lose momentum when you are going uphill, because you want to be at the lowest point. So here too, if your previous update value was negative (i.e. you are going down the slope), the "velocity" will automatically be negative. Also having said that, the sign would probably depend on how you would implement the algorithm (so it can be - if you want it to be!) You can see a similar implementation in both chainer (a Deep learning library; link: https://github.com/pfnet/chainer/blob/5f18ac088973ba650822e031e3081b21a58dbdd8/chainer/optimizers/momentum_sgd.py) and CS231n course material (link in resource section). I would strongly recommend you to go through the actual paper and see the interpretations for yourself. Here's the link http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~fritz/absps/momentum.pdf Cheers!

Thanks for such a good explanation. "Even when optimizing a convex optimization problem, there may be numerous minimal points. The lowest point is called global minimum, whereas rest of the points are called local minima. Our aim is to go to global minimum while avoiding local minima" Q: Is it possible for convex function to have more minimal points? It would be great if you can give some convex function example having more than one minimal points. Thanks in Advance..

your blog is really inspiring. Can you plz tell were can i find .csv file.

Hi Sneha, Thank you for the feedback. You can download the datasets from here.

Nice and super article. Thanks for all your work, FAIZAN SHAIKH , It’s very helpful