# How to predict waiting time using Queuing Theory ?

## Introduction

Queuing Theory, as the name suggests, is a study of long waiting lines done to predict queue lengths and waiting time. It’s a popular theory used largely in the field of operational, retail analytics. In my previous articles, I’ve already discussed the basic intuition behind this concept with beginner and intermediate level case studies.

This is the last article of this series. Hence, make sure you’ve gone through the previous levels (beginner and intermediate).

Until now, we solved cases where volume of incoming calls and duration of call was known before hand. In real world, this is not the case. In real world, we need to assume a distribution for arrival rate and service rate and act accordingly. I wish things were less complicated! Let’s understand these terms:

**Arrival rate** is simply a result of customer demand and companies don’t have control on these. **Service rate,** on the other hand, largely depends on how many caller representative are available to service, what is their performance and how optimized is their schedule.

In this article, I will bring you closer to actual operations analytics using Queuing theory. We will also address few questions which we answered in a simplistic manner in previous articles.

## Table of Contents

- What is Queuing Theory ?
- Concepts used in Queuing Theory
- Kendall’s Notation
- Important Parameters of Interest
- Little Theorem

- Case Study 1 using R
- Case Study 2 using R

## What is Queuing Theory ?

As discussed above, queuing theory is a study of long waiting lines done to estimate queue lengths and waiting time. It uses probabilistic methods to make predictions used in the field of operational research, computer science, telecommunications, traffic engineering etc.

Queuing theory was first implemented in the beginning of 20th century to solve telephone calls congestion problems. Hence, it isn’t any newly discovered concept. Today, this concept is being heavily used by companies such as Vodafone, Airtel, Walmart, AT&T, Verizon and many more to prepare themselves for future traffic before hand.

Let’s dig into this theory now. We’ll now understand an important concept of queuing theory known as Kendall’s notation & Little Theorem.

## Kendall’s notation

This notation can be easily applied to cover a large number of simple queuing scenarios. This is a shorthand notation of the type A/B/C/D/E/F where *A, B, C, D, E,F* describe the queue. Every letter has a meaning here. The various standard meanings associated with each of these letters are summarized below.

A is the Inter-arrival Time distribution . Here are the possible values it can take :

B is the Service Time distribution. Here are the possible values it can take:

C gives the Number of Servers in the queue. It has to be a positive integer.

D gives the Maximum Number of jobs which are available in the system counting both those who are waiting and the ones in service. In case, if the number of jobs are not available, then the default value of infinity (∞) is assumed implying that the queue has an infinite number of waiting positions

E gives the number of arrival components. In general, we take this to be infinity (∞) as our system accepts any customer who comes in. However, in case of machine maintenance where we have fixed number of machines which requires maintenance, this is also a fixed positive integer.

F represents the Queuing Discipline that is followed. The typical ones are First Come First Served (FCFS), Last Come First Served (LCFS), Service in Random Order (SIRO) etc.. If this is not given, then the default queuing discipline of FCFS is assumed. Possible values are :

The simplest member of queue model is *M/M/1/∞/∞/FCFS*.

This means that we have a single server; the service rate distribution is exponential; arrival rate distribution is poisson process; with infinite queue length allowed and anyone allowed in the system; finally its a first come first served model.

## Parameters of Interest

A queuing model works with multiple parameters. These parameters help us analyze the performance of our queuing model. Think of what all factors can we be interested in? Here are a few parameters which we would be interested for any queuing model:

- Probability of no customer in the system
- Probability of no queue in the system
- Probability that the new customer will get a server directly as soon as he comes into the system
- Probability that a new customer is not allowed in the system
- Average length of the queue
- Average population in the system
- Average waiting time
- Average time for a customer in the system

## Little Theorem

It’s an interesting theorem. Let’s understand it using an example.

Consider a queue that has a process with mean arrival rate of λ actually entering the system. Let *N *be the mean number of jobs (customers) in the system (waiting and in service) and *W* be the mean time spent by a job in the system (waiting and in service).

**Little’s Result** then states that these quantities will be related to each other as:

**N= λW **

This theorem comes in very handy to derive the waiting time given the queue length of the system.

Parameters for 4 simplest series:

**1. M/M/1/∞/∞**

Here, N and Nq are the number of people in the system and in the queue respectively. Also W and Wq are the waiting time in the system and in the queue respectively. Rho is the ratio of arrival rate to service rate. Also the probabilities can be given as :

where, p0 is the probability of zero people in the system and pk is the probability of k people in the system.

**2. M/M/1/∞/∞ Queue with Discouraged Arrivals :**

This is one of the common distribution because the arrival rate goes down if the queue length increases. Imagine you went to Pizza hut for a pizza party in a food court. But the queue is too long. You would probably eat something else just because you expect high waiting time.

As you can see the arrival rate decreases with increasing k.

**3. M/M/c/∞/∞**

With c servers the equations become a lot more complex. Here are the expressions for such Markov distribution in arrival and service.

## Case Study 1

Imagine, you work for a multi national bank. You have the responsibility of setting up the entire call center process. You are expected to tie up with a call centre and tell them the number of servers you require.

You are setting up this call centre for a specific feature queries of customers which has an influx of around 20 queries in an hour. Each query take approximately 15 minutes to be resolved. Find out the number of servers/representatives you need to bring down the average waiting time to less than 30 seconds.

### Solution

The given problem is a M/M/c type query with following parameters.

Lambda = 20

Mue = 4

Here is an R code that can find out the waiting time for each value of number of servers/reps.

> Lambda <- 20 > Mue <- 4 > Rho <- Lambda/Mue #Create an empty matrix > matrix <- matrix(0,10,2) > matrix[,1] <- 1:10 #Create a function than can find the waiting time > calculatewq <- function(c){ P0inv <- Rho^c/(factorial(c)*(1-(Rho/c))) for (i in 1:c-1) { P0inv = P0inv + (Rho^i)/factorial(i) } P0 = 1/P0inv Lq = (Rho^(c+1))*P0/(factorial(c-1)*(c-Rho)^2) Wq = 60*Lq/Lambda Ls <- Lq + Rho Ws <- 60*Ls/Lambda #print(paste(Lq," is queue length and ",Wq," is the waiting time")) a <- cbind(Lq,Wq,Ls,Ws) return(a) } #Now populate the matrix with each value of waiting time > for (i in 1:10){ matrix[i,2] <- calculatewq(i)[2] }

Here are the values we get for waiting time:

A negative value of waiting time means the value of the parameters is not feasible and we have an unstable system. Clearly with 9 Reps, our average waiting time comes down to 0.3 minutes.

## Case Study 2

Let’s take a more complex example.

Imagine, you are the Operations officer of a Bank branch. Your branch can accommodate a maximum of 50 customers. How many tellers do you need if the number of customer coming in with a rate of 100 customer/hour and a teller resolves a query in 3 minutes ?

You need to make sure that you are able to accommodate more than 99.999% customers. This means only less than 0.001 % customer should go back without entering the branch because the brach already had 50 customers. Also make sure that the wait time is less than 30 seconds.

### Solution

This is a “M/M/c/N = 50/∞” kind of queue system. Don’t worry about the queue length formulae for such complex system (directly use the one given in this code). Just focus on how we are able to find the probability of customer who leave without resolution in such finite queue length system.

Here is the R-code

> Lambda <- 100 > Mue <- 20 > Rho <- Lambda/Mue > N <- 50 > matrix <- matrix(0,100,3) > matrix[,1] <- 1:100 > calculatewq(6) > calculatewq <- function(c){ P0inv <- (Rho^c*(1-((Rho/c)^(N-c+1))))/(factorial(c)*(1-(Rho/c))) for (i in 1:c-1) { P0inv = P0inv + (Rho^i)/factorial(i) } P0 = 1/P0inv Lq = (Rho^(c+1))*(1-((Rho/c)^(N-c+1))-((N-c+1)*(1-(Rho/c))*((Rho/c)^(N-c))))*P0/(factorial(c-1)*(c-Rho)^2) Wq = 60*Lq/Lambda Ls <- Lq + Rho Ws <- 60*Ls/Lambda PN <- (Rho^N)*P0/(factorial(c)*c^(N-c)) customer_serviced <- (1 - PN)*100 #print(paste(Lq," is queue length and ",Wq," is the waiting time")) a <- cbind(Lq,Wq,Ls,Ws,customer_serviced) return(a) } > for (i in 1:100){ matrix[i,2] <- calculatewq(i)[2] matrix[i,3] <- calculatewq(i)[5] }

Clearly you need more 7 reps to satisfy both the constraints given in the problem where customers leaving

## End Notes

With this article, we have now come close to how to look at an operational analytics in real life. The application of queuing theory is not limited to just call centre or banks or food joint queues. It expands to optimizing assembly lines in manufacturing units or IT software development process etc.

Did you like reading this article ? Do share your experience / suggestions in the comments section below.

## 4 thoughts on "How to predict waiting time using Queuing Theory ?"

## Shabbir P says: April 28, 2016 at 12:05 pm

Great intro to queue theory.## Denny Chen says: April 28, 2016 at 4:31 pm

Just want to mention there is a R queueing package: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pdq-qnm-pkg/## Asesh Datta says: April 29, 2016 at 10:33 am

Great Tavish, Compliments to you to have the belief that future data analysis professional will understand Queuing theory. You have really presented some down to earth case studies and solved with queuing theory. Much before data analytics came, the problem of queuing theory in bank , telephone service existed. Industry used to solve these using these formulations may be solved using data tables by hand. What has changed? A software to get results instantaneously with running live data of customer arrival pattern, service delivery duration and identification of dissatisfied customers going back. Then the analytics become more lively, decision making effective, dissatisfied customers are less and business grows. One more chapter from your end on these real life scenarios may be useful Earlier queuing system in railways is so rigid and decision to open additional counter is so slow, the result is passengers missing trains, ticket less travel rises, passengers have no alternatives to railway travel, hence looses time, effort, money and satisfaction. Today these parameters lead to on line book, making ticket servicing efficient and cost effective. So how this queuing theory is useful even beyond 'queue'? How nice article. Regards Asesh Datta eTechGuys## Kuber says: February 03, 2017 at 1:14 am

Hi Tavish, I am trying to solve similar problem where I am trying to forecast incoming call volumes from customer using 2 years of data. On the broader scope, this will actually result in optimizing number of reps needed on a given single day/month ? Can you please elaborate ? Thanks!