AI has evolved far beyond basic LLMs that rely on carefully crafted prompts. We are now entering the era of autonomous systems that can plan, decide, and act with minimal human input. This shift has given rise to Agentic AI: systems designed to pursue goals, adapt to changing conditions, and execute complex tasks on their own. As organizations race to adopt these capabilities, understanding Agentic AI is becoming a key skill.
To assist you in this race, here are 30 interview questions to test and strengthen your knowledge in this rapidly growing field. The questions range from fundamentals to more nuanced concepts to help you get a good grasp of the depth of the domain.
A. Agentic AI refers to systems that demonstrate autonomy. Unlike traditional AI (like a classifier or a basic chatbot) which follows a strict input-output pipeline, an AI Agent operates in a loop: it perceives the environment, reasons about what to do, acts, and then observes the result of that action.
| Traditional AI (Passive) | Agentic AI (Active) |
| Gets a single input and produces a single output | Receives a goal and runs a loop to achieve it |
| “Here is an image, is this a cat?” | “Book me a flight to London under $600” |
| No actions are taken | Takes real actions like searching, booking, or calling APIs |
| Does not change strategy | Adjusts strategy based on results |
| Stops after responding | Keeps going until the goal is reached |
| No awareness of success or failure | Observes outcomes and reacts |
| Cannot interact with the world | Searches airline sites, compares prices, retries |
A. A robust agent typically consists of four pillars:

A. While the landscape moves fast, the industry standards in 2026 are:
A.
| Aspect | Base Model | Assistant (Instruct/Chat) Model |
| Training method | Trained only with unsupervised next-token prediction on large internet text datasets | Starts from a base model, then refined with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) |
| Goal | Learn statistical patterns in text and continue sequences | Follow instructions, be helpful, safe, and conversational |
| Behavior | Raw and unaligned; may produce irrelevant or list-style completions | Aligned to user intent; gives direct, task-focused answers and refuses unsafe requests |
| Example response style | Might continue a pattern instead of answering the question | Directly answers the question in a clear, helpful way |
A. The context window is the “working memory” of the LLM, which is the maximum amount of text (tokens) it can process at one time. It is limited primarily due to the Self-Attention Mechanism in Transformers and storage constraints.
The computational cost and memory usage of attention grow quadratically with the sequence length. Doubling the context length requires roughly 4x the compute. While techniques like “Ring Attention” and “Mamba” (State Space Models) are alleviating this, physical VRAM limits on GPUs remain a hard constraint.

A. Yes. Reasoning models differ because they utilize inference-time computation. Instead of answering immediately, they generate a “Chain of Thought” (often hidden or visible as “thought tokens”) to talk through the problem, explore different paths, and self-correct errors before producing the final output.
This makes them significantly better at math, coding, and complex logic, but they introduce higher latency compared to standard “fast” models like GPT-4o-mini or Llama 3.
A. This is a behavioral question, but a strong answer includes:
“I follow a mix of academic and practical sources. For research, I check arXiv Sanity and papers highlighted by Hugging Face Daily Papers. For engineering patterns, I follow the blogs of LangChain and OpenAI. I also actively experiment by running quantized models locally (using Ollama or LM Studio) to test their capabilities hands-on.“
Use the above answer as a template for curating your own.
A. Building with APIs (like Anthropic, OpenAI, or Vertex AI) is fundamentally different from using
top_p (nucleus sampling), and max_tokens. This can be tweaked to get a better response or longer responses than what’s on offer on chat interfaces. A. Consider a Customer Support Agent.
{"order_id": "123"} and calls the Shopify API.
A. This is the fundamental objective function used to train LLMs. The model looks at a sequence of tokens t₁, t₂, …, tₙ and calculates the probability distribution for the next token tₙ₊₁ across its entire vocabulary. By selecting the highest probability token (greedy decoding) or sampling from the top probabilities, it generates text. Surprisingly, this simple statistical goal, when scaled with massive data and computation, results in emergent reasoning capabilities.
A. One is used to instruct other is used to guide:
A. LLMs are frozen in time (training cutoff) and hallucinate facts. RAG solves this by providing the model with an “open book” exam setting.
A. Tool use is the mechanism that turns an LLM from a text generator into an operator.
We provide the LLM with a list of function descriptions (e.g., get_weather, query_database, send_email) in a schema format. If the user asks “Email Bob about the meeting,” the LLM does not write an email text; instead, it outputs a structured object: {"tool": "send_email", "args": {"recipient": "Bob", "subject": "Meeting"}}.
The runtime executes this function, and the result is fed back to the LLM.

A. Here are some of the major security risks of autonomous agent deployment:
A. HITL is an architectural pattern where the agent pauses execution to request human permission or clarification.
refund_user), but the system halts and presents a “Approve/Reject” button to a human operator. Only upon approval does the agent proceed. This is mandatory for high-stakes actions like financial transactions or writing code to production.
A. This requires Hierarchical Planning.
You typically use a “Supervisor” or “Router” architecture. A top-level agent analyzes the complex request and breaks it into sub-goals. It assigns weights or priorities to these goals.
For example, if a user says “Book a flight and finding a hotel is optional,” the Supervisor creates two sub-agents. It marks the Flight Agent as “Critical” and the Hotel Agent as “Best Effort.” If the Flight Agent fails, the whole process stops. If the Hotel Agent fails, the process can still succeed.
A. CoT is a prompting strategy that forces the model to verbalize its thinking steps.
Instead of prompting:
Q: Roger has 5 balls. He buys 2 cans of 3 balls. How many balls? A: [Answer]
We prompt: Q: … A: Roger started with 5. 2 cans of 3 is 6 balls. 5 + 6 = 11. The answer is 11.
In Agentic AI, CoT is crucial for reliability. It forces the agent to plan “I need to check the inventory first, then check the user’s balance” before blindly calling the “buy” tool.

A. Ideally, use a personal story, but here is a strong template:
“A major challenge I faced was Agent Looping. The agent would try to search for data, fail to find it, and then endlessly retry the exact same search query, burning tokens.
Solution: I implemented a ‘scratchpad’ memory where the agent records previous attempts. I also added a ‘Reflection’ step where, if a tool returns an error, the agent must generate a different search strategy rather than retrying the same one. I also implemented a hard limit of 5 steps to prevent runaway costs.“
A. For agents, prompt engineering involves:
A. Observability is the “Dashboard” for your AI. Since LLMs are non-deterministic, you cannot debug them like standard code (using breakpoints).
Observability tools (like LangSmith, Arize Phoenix, or Datadog LLM) allow you to see the inputs, outputs, and latency of every step. You can identify if the retrieval step is slow, if the LLM is hallucinating tool arguments, or if the system is getting stuck in loops. Without it, you are flying blind in production.
A. Trace: Represents the entire lifecycle of a single user request (e.g., from the moment the user types “Hello” to the final response).
Span: A trace is made up of a tree of “spans.” A span is a unit of work.
A. You cannot rely on “eyeballing” chat logs. We use LLM-as-a-Judge,
to create a “Golden Dataset” of questions and ideal answers. Then run the agent against this dataset, using a powerful model (like GPT-4o) to grade the agent’s performance based on specific metrics:
A. The main difference between the two is the process they adopt for training.
A. The Self-Attention Mechanism is the key. It allows the model to look at the entire sequence of words at once (parallel processing) and understand the relationship between words regardless of how far apart they are.
For agents, this is critical because an agent’s context might include a System Prompt (at the start), a tool output (in the middle), and a user query (at the end). Self-attention allows the model to “attend” to the specific tool output relevant to the user query, maintaining coherence over long tasks.
A. These are the “Post-Transformer” architectures gaining traction in 2025/2026.
A. Hallucinations (confidently stating false info) are managed via a multi-layered approach:
Read more: 7 Techniques for Fixing Hallucinations
A. Instead of one giant prompt trying to do everything, MAS splits responsibilities.
A. The main difference between the two techniques is:
A. They act as the Semantic Long-Term Memory.
LLMs understand numbers, not words. Embeddings convert text into long lists of numbers (vectors). Similar concepts (e.g., “Dog” and “Puppy”) end up close together in this mathematical space.
This allows agents to find relevant information even if the user uses different keywords than the source document.
A. Standard RAG retrieves “chunks” of text based on similarity. It fails at “global” questions like “What are the main themes in this dataset?” because the answer isn’t in one chunk.
GraphRAG builds a Knowledge Graph (Entities and Relationships) from the data first. It maps how “Person A” is connected to “Company B.” When retrieving, it traverses these relationships. This allows the agent to answer complex, multi-hop reasoning questions that require synthesizing information from disparate parts of the dataset.
Mastering these answers proves you understand the mechanics of intelligence. The powerful agents we build will always reflect the creativity and empathy of the engineers behind them.
Walk into that room not just as a candidate, but as a pioneer. The industry is waiting for someone who sees beyond the code and understands the true potential of autonomy. Trust your preparation, trust your instincts, and go define the future. Good luck.