In today’s dynamic business environment, a company’s approach to customer experience can significantly impact its brand perception. One poor interaction, such as a missed delivery or an unhelpful agent, and the relationship often doesn’t recover. Industry data puts it into perspective: Nearly 32% of consumers abandon a brand after just one bad experience. The stakes are high, but is that the reality? Most companies still struggle to get it right.
That gap between intent and outcome is bigger than most realize. While 80% of businesses believe that they provide excellent experiences, only 8% of customers agree. It’s not a lack of effort; it’s a mismatch between the tools, the timing, and the human understanding that real service requires.
Picture this: Bob, a longtime customer, orders a $1,000 dishwasher. It’s delayed. But when it does show up, it’s in a damaged condition. Naturally, he contacts support only to be put on hold, transferred, and eventually told to wait for an investigation. No one notices his tone of voice or the repeated follow-ups. In short, the system doesn’t catch that Bob is a few clicks away from cancelling his purchase.
Now multiply that by hundreds of thousands of customers.
What leads to these issues is the disconnect between operational and customer data. Operational systems might know the shipment is late, but they’re blind to Bob’s sentiments in real time. Support transcripts, call logs, and chat messages are full of clues, but the systems can’t connect the dots fast enough to matter.
And this drives up costs. Each time a customer calls back or escalates, it adds $8 to $15 per call, with complex cases costing even more. Every unresolved issue eats into trust and margins. Over time, the impact becomes hard to ignore.
At Dentsu Global Services (DGS), we have adopted a different approach to solve this. While a lot of companies are running Generative AI (GenAI) pilots in isolated pockets, we stepped back and asked: what would it take to build a system that not only understands people but also learns from their behavior at scale?
That led us to what we now call Generative Machine Learning, or GML. It’s not a buzzword. It’s the backbone of a new way to make decisions that puts people first.
Think of it like this. GenAI is great at understanding language. It can read a customer’s message, pick up on frustration, and even generate a helpful response. Machine learning (ML), on the other hand, excels at spotting patterns and predicting outcomes based on past behaviour. On their own, both are useful. But together? They’re powerful.

With GML, we’re combining these strengths into one system that can:
It’s about having the right lens to see what’s really going on, and the muscle to do something about it, fast.

It helps to see how this plays out in the real world. Here’s what a typical use case looks like:
Behind the scenes, two design choices made all the difference:

Within just a few weeks of going live:
These aren’t just vanity metrics. They point to a system that understands what matters most to customers and makes life easier for the people trying to serve them.
The tech is only half the story. For GML to really work, the plumbing has to be right. That means:
We’ve seen too many good ideas get stuck in PowerPoint because the infrastructure wasn’t ready. GML demands readiness across the board, especially when the goal is to intervene before the complaint happens, not after.

We’re not pitching GML as a silver bullet. It’s a shift in how we think about service. Instead of analysing what went wrong after the fact, we’re building systems that anticipate problems and give teams the tools to fix them, while there’s still time to make it right.
It’s scalable. It learns as it goes. And most importantly, it helps us treat customers less like support tickets and more like people with stories, frustrations, and expectations.
This article was developed with contributions from Pavak Biswal, Senior Manager at Dentsu Global Services.
A. GML combines Generative AI’s language understanding with Machine Learning’s predictive power to spot risks, personalize responses, and act in real time.
A. It scans operational and conversational data, flags at-risk orders, assigns risk scores, and nudges agents to act before issues escalate.
A. Satisfaction rose 22%, resolution times dropped 80%, and DGS saved $6 million in churn while cutting call costs by $500,000.
A. It merges operational data (shipments, orders) with conversational signals (chats, calls), giving a holistic picture that drives faster and more accurate interventions.
A. Real-time data flow, connected systems, and fast responses—no batch jobs or delays—so action happens before a complaint, not after.