Ability to create entire presentations with just a prompt? Single prompt generation is another welcome addition to an already robust Gemini chatbot. From vernacular language support to advanced images editing capabilities, Gemini has slowly been moving towards the next phase of its AI journey. Whether this upgrade delivers what it states or it is just another presentation, weโll figure out in this article.
Google just announced via Gemini Appโs X handle, โGo from blank slide to polished presentation faster with Canvas in Geminiโ announcing the release of Presentation creation abilities of Gemini. This was a long time coming, considering most of its contemporaries like Kimi, ChatGPT have already released such functionality a while back. Which in itself was a long time coming, considering third-party tools like Gamma.app have already become a household name, due to their early adopter advantage, even before those arrived.
But now the wait is over, and we have Gemini to ourselves. Let’s see how well it performs in everyday presentation tasks.

Iโd be testing Geminiโs presentation creation capabilities on the following tasks:
This would test not only how good it is in synthesising provided information, but also in producing from scratch.
Prompt: โCreate a presentation on the topic: Gojo vs Sukuna.โ
Response: The following presentation was provided as the response:
Opinion: The presentation was acceptable. It consisted of a mix of visuals and information. A lot more information in the form of slides, could have been added, but itโs a good enough starting point. One thing to note is that the slides that were obtained at the end, had .html as its extension, rather than .pdf or .pptx as we wouldโve expected.

This led the download button to download the .html file. Through this html file, the slides couldnโt be obtained. This makes the download button practically useless, in this scenario.
Prompt: โHere is an article that I am working on. Could you create a presentation for it.โ
The document provided as an input was the draft version of the following article (same contents):
How to Build a Smart AI Voice Assistant with Vapi: A Step-by-Step Tutorial
Response: The following presentation was provided as the response:
Opinion: The presentation was a clear miss from what was expected. It was on the topic โAI’s Rise in Creative Fieldsโ whereas the docx file contained the draft on โHow to Build a Smart AI Voice Assistant with Vapiโ. The presentation wasnโt related to the topic by any means.
I was wondering, how would other AI-powered presentation makers fare in this specific task. For that, I provided the same document to Gamma.ai, and hereโs the result:
The presentation was a lot better than the one provided by Gemini. It was a lot closer to the topic and understood the context sufficiently.
If it’s ease of access, then Gemini takes the cake. Offering a multitude of services and features at a centralized source. If itโs about making good presentation, then probably not. The presentation features of Gemini leaves a lot to be desired. From long production times, to lacklustre slides, it wasn’t worth the wait. Here are some of the problems I found during its use:



Unless, the task is for the bare minimum likening classroom presentations, Geminiโs new presentation feature probably wonโt come in handy.
โCreate a presentation with a single promptโ is what they said. Which is true, if youโre okay with a placeholder for a presentation. Itโs hard for me to realize its benefits, when Gemini fails to create a satisfactory presentation on something as simple as โApple (fruit)โ. Iโd advise sticking to its alternatives, till its performance improves. If it’s a capstone for whatโs to follow, then it’s a step in the right direction. Hopefully its performance appreciates with time, just like it did with nano banana.
A. Yes, but expect a draft, not a polished deck. Itโs useful for starting points, not final slides.
A. It tries, but accuracy isnโt reliable yet. In testing, it created slides unrelated to the source document.
A. Right now, Gemini outputs an HTML version of slides. It doesnโt properly export to PPT or PDF yet, which limits usability.
A. It trails behind options like Gamma and ChatGPT in slide structure, depth, and context understanding.
A. Itโs best for quick placeholders or school-level slides. For polished, client-ready decks, choose other tools until Gemini matures. It has potential, but right now the gaps show. Treat it as a drafting tool, not a finished-product machine.