AI and ML developers often work with local datasets while preprocessing data. Engineering features, and building prototypes make this easy without the overhead of a full server. The most common comparison is between SQLite, a serverless database released in 2000 and widely used for lightweight transactions, and DuckDB, introduced in 2019 as the SQLite of analytics, focused on fast in-process analytical queries. While both are embedded, their goals differ. In this article, we’ll compare DuckDB and SQLite to help you choose the right tool for each stage of your AI workflow.
SQLite is a self-contained database engine that is serverless. It creates a button directly out of a disk file. It is zero-configured and has a low footprint. The database is all stored in one file that is.sqlite and the tables and indexes are all contained in that file. The engine itself is a C library that is embedded in your application.
SQLite is an ACID-compliant database, even though it is simple. This makes it dependable in the transactions and data integrity.
Key features include:
SQLite is frequently selected in mobile applications and Internet of Things, as well as small web applications. It is luminous where you require a straightforward solution to store structured data locally, and when you will require numerous short read and write operations.
DuckDB is a data analytics in-process database. It takes the strength of the SQL database to embedded applications. It will execute complicated analytical queries effectively without a server. This analytical focus is frequently the basis of comparison between DuckDB and SQLite.
The important features of DuckDB are:
DuckDB can be used to quickly process interactive data analysis in Jupyter notebooks and speed up Pandas workflows. It takes data warehouse capabilities in a small and local package.
First, here is a summary table comparing SQLite and DuckDB on important aspects.
| Aspect | SQLite (since 2000) | DuckDB (since 2019) |
| Primary Purpose | Embedded OLTP database (transactions) | Embedded OLAP database (analytics) |
| Storage Model | Row-based (stores entire rows together) | Columnar (stores columns together) |
| Query Execution | Iterative row-at-a-time processing | Vectorized batch processing |
| Performance | Excellent for small, frequent transactions | Excellent for analytical queries on large data |
| Data Size | Optimized for small-to-medium datasets | Handles large and out-of-memory datasets |
| Concurrency | Multi-reader, single-writer (via locks) | Multi-reader, single-writer; parallel query execution |
| Memory Use | Minimal memory footprint by default | Leverages memory for speed; can use more RAM |
| SQL Features | Robust basic SQL with some limits | Broad SQL support for advanced analytics |
| Indexes | B-tree indexes are often needed | Relies on column scans; indexing is less common |
| Integration | Supported in nearly every language | Native integration with Pandas, Arrow, NumPy |
| File Formats | Proprietary file; can import/export CSVs | Can directly query Parquet, CSV, JSON, Arrow |
| Transactions | Fully ACID-compliant | ACID within a single process |
| Parallelism | Single-threaded query execution | Multi-threaded execution for a single query |
| Typical Use Cases | Mobile apps, IoT devices, local app storage | Data science notebooks, local ML experiments |
| License | Public domain | MIT License (open source) |
This table reveals that SQLite focuses on reliability and operations of transactions. DuckDB is optimized to support quick analytic queries on big data. Now we are going to discuss each one of them.
We will see how to utilize both databases in Python. It is an open-source AI development environment.
This is an easy representation of SQLite Python. We shall develop a table, enter data, and execute a query.
import sqlite3
# Connect to a SQLite database file
conn = sqlite3.connect("example.db")
cur = conn.cursor()
# Create a table
cur.execute(
"""
CREATE TABLE users (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT,
age INTEGER
);
"""
)
# Insert records into the table
cur.execute(
"INSERT INTO users (name, age) VALUES (?, ?);",
("Alice", 30)
)
cur.execute(
"INSERT INTO users (name, age) VALUES (?, ?);",
("Bob", 35)
)
conn.commit()
# Query the table
for row in cur.execute(
"SELECT name, age FROM users WHERE age > 30;"
):
print(row)
# Expected output: ('Bob', 35)
conn.close()
Output:

The database in this case is kept in the example.db file. We have made a table, added two rows to it, and executed a simple query. SQLite makes you load data into the tables and then query. In case you have a CSV file, you must import the information first.
Still, it is time to repeat this option with DuckDB. We shall also bring your attention to its data science conveniences.
import duckdb
import pandas as pd
# Connect to an in-memory DuckDB database
conn = duckdb.connect()
# Create a table and insert data
conn.execute(
"""
CREATE TABLE users (
id INTEGER,
name VARCHAR,
age INTEGER
);
"""
)
conn.execute(
"INSERT INTO users VALUES (1, 'Alice', 30), (2, 'Bob', 35);"
)
# Run a query on the table
result = conn.execute(
"SELECT name, age FROM users WHERE age > 30;"
).fetchall()
print(result) # Expected output: [('Bob', 35)]
Output:

The simple use resembles the basic usage. Nevertheless, external data can also be queried by DuckDB.
Let’s generate a random dataset for querying:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
# Generate random sales data
np.random.seed(42)
num_entries = 1000
data = {
"category": np.random.choice(
["Electronics", "Clothing", "Home Goods", "Books"],
num_entries
),
"price": np.round(
np.random.uniform(10, 500, num_entries),
2
),
"region": np.random.choice(
["EUROPE", "AMERICA", "ASIA"],
num_entries
),
"sales_date": (
pd.to_datetime("2023-01-01")
+ pd.to_timedelta(
np.random.randint(0, 365, num_entries),
unit="D"
)
)
}
sales_df = pd.DataFrame(data)
# Save to sales_data.csv
sales_df.to_csv("sales_data.csv", index=False)
print("Generated 'sales_data.csv' with 1000 entries.")
print(sales_df.head())
Output:

Now, let’s query this table:
# Assume 'sales_data.csv' exists
# Example 1: Querying a CSV file directly
avg_prices = conn.execute(
"""
SELECT
category,
AVG(price) AS avg_price
FROM 'sales_data.csv'
WHERE region = 'EUROPE'
GROUP BY category;
"""
).fetchdf() # Returns a Pandas DataFrame
print(avg_prices.head())
# Example 2: Querying a Pandas DataFrame directly
df = pd.DataFrame({
"id": range(1000),
"value": range(1000)
})
result = conn.execute(
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM df WHERE value % 2 = 0;"
).fetchone()
print(result) # Expected output: (500,)
Output:

In this case, DuckDB reads the CSV file on the fly. No important step is required. It is also able to query a Pandas DataFrame. This flexibility removes much of the data loading code and simplifies AI pipelines.
The differences in the performance of SQLite and DuckDB have to do with their storage and query engines.
SELECT AVG(age) only reads the age column which is much faster. This is a good guideline to follow in your AI and machine learning projects.
| Aspect | Use SQLite when | Use DuckDB when |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | You need a lightweight transactional database | You need fast local analytics |
| Data size | Low data volume, up to a few hundred MBs | Medium to large datasets |
| Workload type | Inserts, updates, and simple lookups | Aggregations, joins, and large table scans |
| Transaction needs | Frequent small updates with transactional integrity | Read-heavy analytical queries |
| File handling | Data stored inside the database | Query CSV or Parquet files directly |
| Performance focus | Minimal footprint and simplicity | High-speed analytical performance |
| Integration | Mobile apps, embedded systems, IoT | Accelerating Pandas-based analysis |
| Parallel execution | Not a priority | Uses multiple CPU cores |
| Typical use case | Application state and lightweight storage | Local data exploration and analytics |
Both SQLite and DuckDB are strong embedded databases. SQLite is a very good lightweight data storage and easy-going transaction tool. However, DuckDB can significantly accelerate the processing of data and prototyping of AI developers operating with big data. This is because when you are aware of their differences, you will know the right tool to use in different tasks. In case of contemporary data analysis and machine learning processes, DuckDB can save you a lot of time with a considerable performance benefit.
A. No, they are of other uses. DuckDB is used to access fast analytics (OLAP), whereas SQLite is used to enter into reliable transactions. Select according to your workload.
A. SQLite is typically more suited to web applications that have a large number of small, communicating reads and writes because it has a sound transactional model and WAL mode.
A. Yes, with most large-scale jobs, such as group-bys and joins, DuckDB can be a lot faster than Pandas due to its parallel, vectorized engine.